United States v. Richmond
Opinion
UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before R.Q. WARD, K.M. MCDONALD, S.A. DOMINGUEZ Appellate Military Judges
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
TRAVIS R. RICHMOND LANCE CORPORAL (E-3), U.S. MARINE CORPS
NMCCA 201400051 SPECIAL COURT-MARTIAL
Sentence Adjudged: 17 October 2013. Military Judge: Col James Carberry, USMC. Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, Combat Logistics Battalion 3, Combat Logistics Regiment 3, 3d Marine Logistics Group, MCBH, Kaneohe Bay, HI. Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation: Maj P.D. Sanchez, USMC. For Appellant: Maj Emmett Collazo, USMCR. For Appellee: Mr. Brian Keller, Esq.
26 June 2014
--------------------------------------------------- OPINION OF THE COURT ---------------------------------------------------
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). The supplemental court-martial order will reflect that the Government withdrew and dismissed the words “and sporting goods” from the specification prior to the entry of findings.
For the Court
R.H. TROIDL Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Richmond (United States v. Richmond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.