United States v. Richey
This text of United States v. Richey (United States v. Richey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 20, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-40726 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JULIE RICHEY,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-02-CR-141-1 --------------------
Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Julie Richey appeals her sentence following a guilty plea to
conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than 100
kilograms of marijuana. Richey argues that the district court
clearly erred by increasing her sentence based on its
determination that Richey acted as an organizer, leader, manager,
or supervisor in the offense. Having reviewed the evidence
presented at sentencing, we find no error in the district court’s
determination. United States v. Turner, 319 F.3d 716, 725 (5th
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 03-40726 -2-
Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 123 S. Ct. 1939 (2003); United
States v. Powers, 168 F.3d 741, 752-53 (5th Cir. 1999).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Richey, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-richey-ca5-2004.