United States v. Richardson
This text of 651 F. App'x 156 (United States v. Richardson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Curtis Richardson seeks to appeal the district court’s order finding pretrial detention appropriate. However, because Richardson subsequently entered a plea of guilty in the district court, we conclude that his appeal is moot, see Murphy v. Hunt, 455 U.S. 478, 481-82, 102 S.Ct. 1181, 71 L.Ed.2d 358 (1982), and we dismiss the appeal on that basis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
651 F. App'x 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-richardson-ca4-2016.