United States v. Richards-Bedwood
140 F. App'x 854
This text of 140 F. App'x 854 (United States v. Richards-Bedwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Richards-Bedwood, 140 F. App'x 854 (11th Cir. 2005).
Opinion
As the government correctly concedes, the Appellant’s sentence is due to be VACATED and the case REMANDED for the limited purpose of resentencing in light of United States v. Booker, — U.S. —, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).
SENTENCE VACATED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
140 F. App'x 854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-richards-bedwood-ca11-2005.