United States v. Richard Perales
This text of United States v. Richard Perales (United States v. Richard Perales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________
No. 99-3854 ___________
United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Richard Perales, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. * ___________
Submitted: August 25, 2000 Filed: September 7, 2000 ___________
Before BOWMAN, HEANEY, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. ___________
PER CURIAM.
The district court1 committed Richard Perales to the Attorney General’s custody, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4246, finding that he was suffering from a mental disease and that his release would pose a substantial risk of bodily injury or serious property damage. Perales appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence.
1 The Honorable Russell G. Clark, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable James C. England, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri. We conclude that the district court’s findings are not clearly erroneous, see United States v. S.A., 129 F.3d 995, 1000 (8th Cir. 1997) (standard of review), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1011 (1998), as they are supported by the unanimous opinion of the government’s medical experts and Perales’s own medical expert, see United States v. Lewis, 929 F.2d 440, 442 (8th Cir. 1991) (per curiam) (§ 4246 findings of mental disease and dangerousness upheld where supported by unanimous expert opinion); United States v. Steil, 916 F.2d 485, 488 (8th Cir. 1990) (emphasizing that “there is no medical opinion to the contrary in the record before us” in affirming § 4246 findings of mental illness and dangerousness).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Richard Perales, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-richard-perales-ca8-2000.