United States v. Richard Paul Day
This text of 17 F.3d 1435 (United States v. Richard Paul Day) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
17 F.3d 1435
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Richard Paul DAY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 93-7018.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 17, 1994.
Decided March 3, 1994.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CR-91-50, CA-93-143-R)
Richard Paul Day, Appellant Pro Se.
Thomas Jack Bondurant, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, VA, for Appellee.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Day, No. CR-91-50; CA-93-143-R (W.D. Va. Aug. 31, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 F.3d 1435, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 12238, 1994 WL 65203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-richard-paul-day-ca4-1994.