United States v. Richard Ichihara

385 F. App'x 656
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJune 22, 2010
Docket09-10280
StatusUnpublished

This text of 385 F. App'x 656 (United States v. Richard Ichihara) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Richard Ichihara, 385 F. App'x 656 (9th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Richard John Iehihara appeals from the 30-year sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for continuing criminal enterprise, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 848(a), (b) & (s), conspiracy to distribute more than 50 grams net weight of methamphetamine hydrochloride, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846, and money laundering, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 956(a)(1)(B)®. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Iehihara contends that the district court erred when it imposed a two-level enhancement for importation of methamphetamine pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(4). The record reflects that Iehihara admitted to knowingly importing methamphetamine, and we therefore conclude that the district court did not err. See U.S.S.G. § 2Dl.l(b)(4).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Prohibited acts A
21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1)
Exemption authority
21 U.S.C. § 956(a)(1)(B)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
385 F. App'x 656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-richard-ichihara-ca9-2010.