United States v. Richard Herman Lord
This text of 475 F.2d 763 (United States v. Richard Herman Lord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant was convicted of narcotics violations. We affirm.
The evidence on entrapment being in conflict, the issue was properly submitted to the jury. United States v. Griffin, 434 F.2d 978 (9th Cir., 1970), certiorari denied sub nom. Andrews v. United States, 402 U.S. 995, 91 S.Ct. 2170, 29 L.Ed.2d 160 (1971). We decline to add to the prosecution’s burden by holding that absence of entrapment is an element of the offense charged, rather than a defense to be overcome by the prosecution like other defenses, once it is established as a legitimate issue. Cf. Pulido v. United States, 425 F.2d 1391 (9th Cir., 1970).
The trial judge’s comments to the jury, while not a model, 1 did not, when taken as a whole constitute reversible error.
Defendant’s remaining point, pre-indictment delay, is equally without merit, United States v. Marion, 404 U.S. 307, 92 S.Ct. 455, 30 L.Ed.2d 468 (1971), even if preserved for appeal, United States v. Garcia, 422 F.2d 1301 (9th Cir., 1970).
Affirmed.
. We cannot approve, for example, the judge’s statement, that he found defendant’s story incredible and did not believe it.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
475 F.2d 763, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11053, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-richard-herman-lord-ca9-1973.