United States v. Richard Hayes Hinton
This text of 370 F.2d 570 (United States v. Richard Hayes Hinton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Richard Hayes HINTON, Appellant.
No. 10586.
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.
Argued Dec. 8, 1966.
Decided Jan. 6, 1967, Certiorari Denied March 13, 1967, See
87 S.Ct. 1031.
Edwin M. Young, Richmond, Va., and Vernon F. Daughtridge, Wilson, N.C., for appellant.
Charles S. Porter, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty. (Terrell L. Glenn, U.S. Atty., on brief), for appellee.
Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and WINTER and CHAVEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This appeal presents the identical question considered by the Court in United States v. Worley, 4 Cir., 368 F.2d 625 (decided November 3, 1966.) We affirm for the reasons stated by us in Worley.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
370 F.2d 570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-richard-hayes-hinton-ca4-1967.