United States v. Richard Hayes Hinton

370 F.2d 570
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 13, 1967·No. 18-1206·Published

Opinion

370 F.2d 570

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Richard Hayes HINTON, Appellant.

No. 10586.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued Dec. 8, 1966.
Decided Jan. 6, 1967, Certiorari Denied March 13, 1967, See
87 S.Ct. 1031.

Edwin M. Young, Richmond, Va., and Vernon F. Daughtridge, Wilson, N.C., for appellant.

Charles S. Porter, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty. (Terrell L. Glenn, U.S. Atty., on brief), for appellee.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and WINTER and CHAVEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This appeal presents the identical question considered by the Court in United States v. Worley, 4 Cir., 368 F.2d 625 (decided November 3, 1966.) We affirm for the reasons stated by us in Worley.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Richard Hayes Hinton, 370 F.2d 570 (4th Cir. 1967).

370 F.2d 570 (United States v. Richard Hayes Hinton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Hinton
370 F.2d 570 (Fourth Circuit, 1967)