United States v. Richard Haren
This text of 52 F.3d 331 (United States v. Richard Haren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
52 F.3d 331
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Richard HAREN, Appellant.
No. 94-1282
United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Apr. 10, 1995
Filed: Apr. 25, 1995
Before MAGILL, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Richard Haren appeals the district court's1 denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's thorough and well-reasoned report and recommendation, which was adopted by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
The Honorable H. Franklin Waters, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable Beverly R. Stites, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 F.3d 331, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21359, 1995 WL 236772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-richard-haren-ca8-1995.