United States v. Richard Field Pieters

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Richard Field Pieters

423 F.2d 1200

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedApril 23, 1970

Docket24350_1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 423 F.2d 1200 (United States v. Richard Field Pieters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Richard Field Pieters, 423 F.2d 1200 (9th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

This is a selective service case in which defendant-appellant for the first time gave notice of asserted conscientious objections at the induction center when he refused to be inducted. On the record, there is no prior official notice of such a claim.

The case is governed by Brown v. United States, 9 Cir., 409 F.2d 1354, and Blades v. United States, 9 Cir., 407 F.2d 1397.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

This is a selective service case in which defendant-appellant for the first time gave notice of asserted conscientious objections at the induction center when he refused to be inducted. On the record, there is no prior official notice of such a claim.

The case is governed by Brown v. United States, 9 Cir., 409 F.2d 1354, and Blades v. United States, 9 Cir., 407 F.2d 1397.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

423 F.2d 1200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-richard-field-pieters-ca9-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack