United States v. Richard Donnell McKinney

450 F.2d 943
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 5, 1971·No. 71-1550·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Richard Donnell McKinney was found guilty of the charge of removal and possession of nontaxpaid whiskey in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5601(a) (12) and 26 U.S.C. §§ 5205(a) (2) and 5604(a) (1). He was sentenced to serve a term of eighteen months under 18 U.S.C. § 4208 (a) (2).

On appeal McKinney contends that the refusal of the trial court to make the presentenee report of the probation officer available to his counsel prior to sentencing was a denial of due process. The answer to this contention is found in the en banc decision of this court upholding the discretionary authority of the trial judge under Rule 32(c) (2) of the Fed.R.Crim.P. to deny the request of the defendant for inspection of the presentence report prior to sentencing. United States v. Knupp, 448 F.2d 412 (4 Cir., 1971).

We find no merit in other assignments of error and the judgment of conviction and sentence will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Richard Donnell McKinney, 450 F.2d 943 (4th Cir. 1971).

450 F.2d 943 (United States v. Richard Donnell McKinney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Aaron Headspeth
852 F.2d 753 (Fourth Circuit, 1988)
Rinehart v. State
234 N.W.2d 649 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1975)
United States v. Gino Rosciano
499 F.2d 173 (Seventh Circuit, 1974)
United States v. Lorraine L. Lowe
482 F.2d 1357 (Sixth Circuit, 1973)