United States v. Richard
This text of 99 F. 262 (United States v. Richard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Paragraph 566 of the act of 1897 puts on the free list “Istle or Tampico fiber, jute, jute butts, manila, sisal grass, sunn, and all other textile grasses or fibrous vegetable substances not manufactured in any manner, and not specially provided. for.” This importation is of natural grass, sun bleached, used for emblems. It has been classified as free under this paragraph, instead.of under paragraph 251, which puts a duty on natural flowers of all kinds, preserved or fresh, suitable for decorative purposes. In Frazee v. Moffitt, 20 Blatchf. 267, 18 Fed. 584, Judge, afterwards Mr. Justice, Blatchford held that hay containing sugar converted by the heat of the sun from starch in the grass" by being dried was not a manufactured article. So this grass, bleached by mere exposure to the sun, is not a manufactured article. It is not made into any new thing. Decision affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
99 F. 262, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 5014, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-richard-circtsdny-1900.