United States v. Richard Bell

310 F.3d 604, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 23579, 2002 WL 31526495
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided November 15, 2002·No. 02-2761·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After Richard Bell pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), the district court 1 sentenced him to eighty-four months in prison and three years of supervised release. Bell renews on appeal the objection he raised below: that his offense level should not have been enhanced under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2K2.1(b)(5) (2001) for possessing the firearm in connection with another felony offense. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm.

The unobjected-to facts in the presen-tence report show that, when authorities executed a search warrant at Bell’s apartment, he was lying on the bed in the bedroom. A loaded revolver was recovered from beneath the mattress he was lying on, and a quantity of slightly more than two grams of cocaine base was found with rolling papers in a pair of shorts on the bedroom floor. Bell does not dispute that his possession of the cocaine base constitutes another felony offense.

We review for clear error the district court’s finding as to Bell’s purpose in possessing the firearm, see United States v. Chavarria-Cabrera, 272 F.3d 1049, 1050 (8th Cir.2001), and we conclude that the district court did not clearly err in finding that Bell possessed the revolver in connection with his possession of the cocaine base, see United States v. Martinez, 258 F.3d 760, 761-62 (8th Cir.2001) (a de *606 fendant’s simultaneous possession of a firearm and a personal-use quantity of drugs, or the proximity of the firearm to the drugs, supports a § 2K2.1(b)(5) enhancement because the defendant has the potential to use the firearm to protect himself or his drugs).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

1

. The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Richard Bell, 310 F.3d 604, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 23579, 2002 WL 31526495 (8th Cir. 2002).

310 F.3d 604 (United States v. Richard Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Tobanche
115 F. Supp. 3d 1339 (D. New Mexico, 2015)
United States v. Barela
102 F. Supp. 3d 1212 (D. New Mexico, 2015)
United States v. Cole
497 F. Supp. 2d 958 (N.D. Iowa, 2007)
United States v. Timmey Dean Hale
138 F. App'x 878 (Eighth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Carl Amburn, Jr.
412 F.3d 909 (Eighth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Stephen Curtner
116 F. App'x 42 (Eighth Circuit, 2004)
United States v. Harold Agee
Eighth Circuit, 2003