United States v. Ricardo Valdovinos

103 F. App'x 920
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJuly 30, 2004
Docket03-3949
StatusUnpublished

This text of 103 F. App'x 920 (United States v. Ricardo Valdovinos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ricardo Valdovinos, 103 F. App'x 920 (8th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

*921 PER CURIAM.

Ricardo Valdovinos challenges the sentence the district court * imposed after Valdovinos pleaded guilty to possessing with intent to distribute approximately 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A). Valdovinos’s counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), contending the court should have granted Valdovinos safety-valve relief under U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2.

Contrary to counsel’s view, the district court could not have granted safety-valve relief in this case because Valdovinos did not submit to an interview with the government. See U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2; United States v. Gutierrez-Maldonado, 328 F.3d 1018, 1019 (8th Cir.2003) (per curiam). In a pro se submission filed after the notice of appeal in this matter that we construe as a supplemental brief, Valdovinos appears to raise a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. This claim, however, is not properly before the court. See United States v. Hughes, 330 F.3d 1068, 1069 (8th Cir. 2003).

We find no nonfrivolous issues after having performed our independent review under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988). We thus affirm the judgment of the district court, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we deny Valdovinos’s motion for new counsel.

*

The Honorable Thomas M. Shanahan, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)
United States v. Adolfo Gutierrez-Maldonado
328 F.3d 1018 (Eighth Circuit, 2003)
United States v. Larry D. Hughes
330 F.3d 1068 (Eighth Circuit, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 F. App'x 920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ricardo-valdovinos-ca8-2004.