United States v. Ricardo Smith

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Ricardo Smith

465 F.2d 1401, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7203

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedOctober 12, 1972

Docket72-1807

StatusPublished

This text of 465 F.2d 1401 (United States v. Ricardo Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Ricardo Smith, 465 F.2d 1401, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7203 (5th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See Local Rule 21. 1 - 2

1

. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir. 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

2

. Appellant alleged four points of error in the trial proceeding: (1) denial of a motion to sever the trial of the two counts under which he was indicted; (2) denial of a motion to sever appellant’s trial from that of his codefendant; (3) admission of testimony involving other offenses; and (4) harassment of defendant’s witnesses by the trial judge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See Local Rule 21. 1 - 2

1

. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir. 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

2

. Appellant alleged four points of error in the trial proceeding: (1) denial of a motion to sever the trial of the two counts under which he was indicted; (2) denial of a motion to sever appellant’s trial from that of his codefendant; (3) admission of testimony involving other offenses; and (4) harassment of defendant’s witnesses by the trial judge.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

465 F.2d 1401, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ricardo-smith-ca5-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack