United States v. Ricardo Sanchez-Lopez

372 F. App'x 713
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 26, 2010
Docket09-30133
StatusUnpublished

This text of 372 F. App'x 713 (United States v. Ricardo Sanchez-Lopez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ricardo Sanchez-Lopez, 372 F. App'x 713 (9th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Ricardo Sanchez-Lopez appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to *714 withdraw his guilty plea. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Sanchez-Lopez contends that the district court erred when it refused to grant his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. The district court did not abuse its discretion when it concluded that Sanchez-Lopez’s belief that a witness would not cooperate with the government was not a fair and just reason for withdrawing his guilty plea. See Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(d)(2)(B); see also United States v. Vasquez-Velasco, 471 F.2d 294, 294-95 (9th Cir.1973) (per curiam). Further, the record supports the district court’s conclusion that there was no indication that the witness would testify on Sanehez-Lopez’s behalf or exonerate him. Finally, Sanchez-Lopez admitted on more than one occasion that he had procured and delivered methamphetamine and accepted firearms and payment.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Roberto Vasquez-Velasco
471 F.2d 294 (Ninth Circuit, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
372 F. App'x 713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ricardo-sanchez-lopez-ca9-2010.