United States v. Ricardo Garcia-Mendoza
This text of 516 F. App'x 641 (United States v. Ricardo Garcia-Mendoza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Ricardo Garcia-Mendoza appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 120-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute metham *642 phetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(A)(viii). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Garcia-Mendoza contends that the district court erred by denying him relief under the safety valve provision of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) and U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2. The district court did not clearly err in finding that Garcia-Mendoza did not, at any time before he was sentenced, truthfully provide the government all of the information he had regarding the offense. See United States v. Orm Hieng, 679 F.3d 1131, 1144 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 775, 184 L.Ed.2d 512 (2012). Garcia-Mendoza was accordingly ineligible for safety valve relief. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(5).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
516 F. App'x 641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ricardo-garcia-mendoza-ca9-2013.