United States v. Ricardo Garcia-Mendoza

516 F. App'x 641
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 22, 2013
Docket12-50200
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 516 F. App'x 641 (United States v. Ricardo Garcia-Mendoza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ricardo Garcia-Mendoza, 516 F. App'x 641 (9th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Ricardo Garcia-Mendoza appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 120-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute metham *642 phetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(A)(viii). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Garcia-Mendoza contends that the district court erred by denying him relief under the safety valve provision of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) and U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2. The district court did not clearly err in finding that Garcia-Mendoza did not, at any time before he was sentenced, truthfully provide the government all of the information he had regarding the offense. See United States v. Orm Hieng, 679 F.3d 1131, 1144 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 775, 184 L.Ed.2d 512 (2012). Garcia-Mendoza was accordingly ineligible for safety valve relief. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(5).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garcia-Mendoza v. United States
134 S. Ct. 294 (Supreme Court, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
516 F. App'x 641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ricardo-garcia-mendoza-ca9-2013.