United States v. Ricardo Garcia-Mendoza
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Ricardo Garcia-Mendoza appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 120-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute metham *642 phetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(A)(viii). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Garcia-Mendoza contends that the district court erred by denying him relief under the safety valve provision of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) and U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2. The district court did not clearly err in finding that Garcia-Mendoza did not, at any time before he was sentenced, truthfully provide the government all of the information he had regarding the offense. See United States v. Orm Hieng, 679 F.3d 1131, 1144 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 775, 184 L.Ed.2d 512 (2012). Garcia-Mendoza was accordingly ineligible for safety valve relief. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(5).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
516 F. App'x 641 (United States v. Ricardo Garcia-Mendoza) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.