United States v. Ricardo Bordallo, Governor of Guam

872 F.2d 334, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 5510, 1989 WL 37337
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 21, 1989
Docket87-1092
StatusPublished
Cited by29 cases

This text of 872 F.2d 334 (United States v. Ricardo Bordallo, Governor of Guam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ricardo Bordallo, Governor of Guam, 872 F.2d 334, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 5510, 1989 WL 37337 (9th Cir. 1989).

Opinion

ORDER

In its petition for rehearing, the government points out that our opinion in this case, 857 F.2d 519 (9th Cir.1988), ordered a reversal of those counts on which the district court had sentenced the appellant to a period of incarceration. The opinion affirmed only those counts on which the district court had sentenced appellant to probation. The government asks that we amend our opinion in order to authorize the district court to resentence the appellant on the counts that have been affirmed. This court has the authority to do so. See United States v. Minor, 846 F.2d 1184, 1187 (9th Cir.1988); United States v. Hagler, 709 F.2d 578 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 917, 104 S.Ct. 282, 78 L.Ed.2d 260 (1983).

Upon due consideration of the government’s motion and the appellant’s response, the government’s request is granted. The mandate in the case shall authorize the district court to resentence the defendant on those counts which this court has affirmed.

The government’s petition for rehearing is in all other respects denied. The appellant’s petition for rehearing is also denied.

The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc and no judge of the court has requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc. Fed. R.App.P. 35.

The suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Duane Ehmer
87 F.4th 1073 (Ninth Circuit, 2023)
United States v. Joe Reyes
764 F.3d 1184 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)
United States v. Greer
Fifth Circuit, 1998
United States v. Charles Randell Greer
158 F.3d 228 (Fifth Circuit, 1998)
United States v. George L. Smith
134 F.3d 380 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Fernandez Leroy Baca
24 F.3d 250 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Foley
851 F. Supp. 507 (D. Connecticut, 1994)
United States v. Darryl Freeman, Tyrone Netters
6 F.3d 586 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Ernest Caravalho
990 F.2d 1261 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Leonard Lee Williams
990 F.2d 507 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Savely
814 F. Supp. 1519 (D. Kansas, 1993)
United States v. Jeremiah Nero
979 F.2d 856 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
United States v. Mario Alberto Vallejo
974 F.2d 1344 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
872 F.2d 334, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 5510, 1989 WL 37337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ricardo-bordallo-governor-of-guam-ca9-1989.