United States v. Rheims Co.
175 F. 778, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4959
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided December 9, 1909·No. No. 97 (4,155)·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The technical objection taken to the finding of the Circuit Court, namely, that error was not sufficiently assigned, is disposed of by what we have said in U. S. v. Loewenthal, 175 Fed. 777, handed down to-day. The decision in Paterson v. U. S., 166 Fed. 733, 92 C. C. A. 524, disposes of the question of classification.
Decision affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Rheims Co., 175 F. 778, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4959 (2d Cir. 1909).
175 F. 778 (United States v. Rheims Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Zimmermann v. United States
5 Ct. Cust. 104 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1914)