United States v. Rheims Co.
175 F. 778, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4959
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedDecember 9, 1909
DocketNo. 97 (4,155)
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 175 F. 778 (United States v. Rheims Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Rheims Co., 175 F. 778, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4959 (2d Cir. 1909).
Opinion
The technical objection taken to the finding of the Circuit Court, namely, that error was not sufficiently assigned, is disposed of by what we have said in U. S. v. Loewenthal, 175 Fed. 777, handed down to-day. The decision in Paterson v. U. S., 166 Fed. 733, 92 C. C. A. 524, disposes of the question of classification.
Decision affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Zimmermann v. United States
5 Ct. Cust. 104 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1914)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
175 F. 778, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4959, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rheims-co-ca2-1909.