United States v. Reynolds
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6412
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
BRIAN T. REYNOLDS,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 98-6464
Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CR-96-109-A, CA-97-1661-AM) Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: June 3, 1998
Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brian T. Reynolds, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Andrew Spencer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
2 PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying
his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998),
and denying his motion for a certificate of appealability. We have
reviewed the record and the district court's orders and opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the dis-
trict court. United States v. Reynolds, Nos. CR-96-109-A; CA-97- 1661-AM (E.D. Va. Dec. 17, 1997; Mar. 11, 1998). We grant Appel-
lant's motion to adopt the attachments from the docketing statement
in No. 98-6412 for consideration in case No. 98-6464. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade-
quately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Reynolds (United States v. Reynolds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.