United States v. Reynolds

76 M.J. 259, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 237

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided April 3, 2017·No. No. 17-0253/AR·Published

Opinion

CCA 20140856.

On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue:

WHETHER, IN A COURT-MARTIAL TRIED BY MILITARY JUDGE ALONE, THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION BY GRANTING THE GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO USE THE CHARGED SEXUAL MISCONDUCT FOR MILITARY RULE OF EVIDENCE 413 PURPOSES TO PROVE PROPENSITY TO COMMIT THE CHARGED SEXUAL MISCONDUCT IN LIGHT OF UNITED STATES v, HILLS AND THAT ERROR WAS NOT HARMLESS BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT.

No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CCA 20140856.

On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue:

WHETHER, IN A COURT-MARTIAL TRIED BY MILITARY JUDGE ALONE, THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION BY GRANTING THE GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO USE THE CHARGED SEXUAL MISCONDUCT FOR MILITARY RULE OF EVIDENCE 413 PURPOSES TO PROVE PROPENSITY TO COMMIT THE CHARGED SEXUAL MISCONDUCT IN LIGHT OF UNITED STATES v, HILLS AND THAT ERROR WAS NOT HARMLESS BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT.

No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

United States v. Reynolds, 76 M.J. 259, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 237 (Ark. 2017).

Pincite

76 M.J. 259 (United States v. Reynolds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.