United States v. Reynard

71 M.J. 378, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 925
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedAugust 8, 2012
DocketNo. 12-0452/AR
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 71 M.J. 378 (United States v. Reynard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Reynard, 71 M.J. 378, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 925 (Ark. 2012).

Opinions

CCA 20100351. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, and in view of United States v. Humphries, 71 M.J. 209 (C.A.A.F. 2012), it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue:

WHETHER APPELLANT SUFFERED MATERIAL PREJUDICE TO A SUBSTANTIAL RIGHT AS A RESULT OF THE GOVERNMENT’S FAILURE TO ALLEGE THE TERMINAL ELEMENT OF ARTICLE 134, UCMJ, IN THE SPECIFICATION OF CHARGE II.

The portion of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals as to Charge II and its Specification and the sentence is reversed. The decision of that court as to the remaining charges and specifications is affirmed. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for remand to that court for further consideration in light of Humphries. [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Master Sergeant RAYMOND J. REYNARD
Army Court of Criminal Appeals, 2012

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 M.J. 378, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-reynard-armfor-2012.