United States v. Reyes-Quintero
This text of 286 F. App'x 480 (United States v. Reyes-Quintero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[481]*481MEMORANDUM
Rafael Reyes-Quintero appeals from the 70-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Reyes-Quintero contends that the district court erred at sentencing by failing to consider the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and by failing to provide sufficient reasons for the sentence it imposed. He also contends that his sentence is unreasonable in light of the § 3553(a) factors. We conclude that the district court did not commit procedural error and that Reyes-Quintero’s sentence is substantively reasonable. See Rita v. United States, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 2468-69, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007); Gall v. United States, — U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 586, 600-02, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); see also United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 995-96 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
286 F. App'x 480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-reyes-quintero-ca9-2008.