United States v. Reyes
This text of 113 F. App'x 283 (United States v. Reyes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Javier Reyes appeals the 57-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to attempted entry after deportation. Reyes challenges the district court’s denial of his request for a downward departure based on a combination of factors, including his inability to accept a 30-month plea offer, which required Reyes to plead guilty to two counts of illegal entry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1325. Reyes explained that he could not accept the offer because it required him to state untruthfully that he first illegally entered the United States at a time when he was too young to have formed the requisite criminal intent for that offense.
We lack jurisdiction because there is no indication that the district court believed that it lacked the authority to depart on that ground.1 United States v. Linn, 362 F.3d 1261 (9th Cir.2004) (reaffirming that discretionary refusals to depart downward are unreviewable).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
113 F. App'x 283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-reyes-ca9-2004.