United States v. Rex Hatfield

423 F. App'x 648
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedJune 14, 2011
Docket10-3890, 10-3905
StatusUnpublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 423 F. App'x 648 (United States v. Rex Hatfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Rex Hatfield, 423 F. App'x 648 (7th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

The defendants were convicted by a jury of distributing illegal drugs with result of causing death to consumers of the drugs, and related offenses, and appealed. We reversed just the convictions relating to some of the deaths, for error in the jury instructions, but affirmed the other convictions, 591 F.3d 945 (7th Cir.2010). On remand to the district court, the government dismissed the charges on which we had reversed, and as a result there was no occasion for a new trial; instead the judge simply resentenced the defendants.

They moved for a new trial of the entire case primarily on the ground that the government had improperly withheld from the defense material the defense could have used to impeach some of the government’s witnesses. The district judge denied the motion for a new trial in a 26-page opinion in which he ruled that the government should have turned over the material but that it would not have altered the result. We have nothing to add to the judge’s analysis. He did not abuse his discretion in denying a new trial.

The judgments are therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hatfield v. United States
181 L. Ed. 2d 367 (Supreme Court, 2011)
Williams v. Wisconsin
565 U.S. 988 (Supreme Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
423 F. App'x 648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rex-hatfield-ca7-2011.