United States v. Resendiz-Ponce
126 S. Ct. 1776
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 30, 2006
Docket05-998
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 126 S. Ct. 1776 (United States v. Resendiz-Ponce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Resendiz-Ponce, 126 S. Ct. 1776 (U.S. 2006).
Opinion
UNITED STATES
v.
JUAN RESENDIZ-PONCE
Supreme Court of United States.
The motion of respondent for appointment of counsel is granted. Atmore Baggot, Esquire, of Apache Junction, Arizona, is appointed to serve as counsel for the respondent in this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Resendiz-Ponce
549 U.S. 102 (Supreme Court, 2007)
Joseph v. Coyle
Sixth Circuit, 2006
Richard Joseph, Petitioner-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Ralph Coyle, Warden, Respondent-Appellee/cross-Appellant
469 F.3d 441 (Sixth Circuit, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
126 S. Ct. 1776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-resendiz-ponce-scotus-2006.