United States v. Resendez-Garcia
This text of 52 F. App'x 60 (United States v. Resendez-Garcia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Mario Resendez-Garcia appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to one count of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841, and one count of possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).
Resendez-Garcia and the government agree that the district court erred by imposing a one-level reduction for minor role [61]*61in the offense, where the Sentencing Guidelines permit only two-level, three-level, or four-level minor role reductions. U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. The parties also agree that the case should be remanded for re-sentencing. Resendez-Gareia argues that the district court should be instructed on remand to apply the two-level reduction. The government argues that the district court should be instructed to determine whether Resendez-Gareia is entitled to the two-level reduction or no reduction. Following United States v. Jeter, 236 F.3d 1032, 1034-35 (9th Cir.2001), we vacate the sentence and remand for the district court to consider whether Resendez-Gareia deserves a two-level downward adjustment or none at all.
VACATED and REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 F. App'x 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-resendez-garcia-ca9-2002.