United States v. Reinhold Sommerstedt

760 F.2d 999
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 15, 1985·No. 84-5116·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The court’s opinion in this case filed February 7, 1985, 752 F.2d 1494 (9th Cir.), is amended as follows:

The third sentence in the first paragraph under “Facts” which reads “Sommerstedt was a member of the group,” is stricken.

The second paragraph under “Facts” is amended to read:

The argument was held in the City Council Chambers of the Pasadena City Hall. Just before the conclusion of Condo’s rebuttal, a member of the court told Condo that he was “fighting a lonely battle.” In response to this remark, Sommerstedt, a supporter of Condo, stood up silently for the last one or two minutes of the argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Reinhold Sommerstedt, 760 F.2d 999 (9th Cir. 1985).

760 F.2d 999 (United States v. Reinhold Sommerstedt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Studebaker v. Uribe
658 F. Supp. 2d 1102 (C.D. California, 2009)
United States v. Jesus Felix-Gutierrez
940 F.2d 1200 (Ninth Circuit, 1991)
United States v. Francis Ravel
930 F.2d 721 (Ninth Circuit, 1991)
United States v. James Cantu Sanchez
914 F.2d 1355 (Ninth Circuit, 1990)
United States v. de Aguilar
871 F.2d 1436 (Ninth Circuit, 1989)
United States v. Aguilar
883 F.2d 662 (Ninth Circuit, 1989)
United States v. Robert Wayne Hohman
825 F.2d 1363 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)