United States v. Reid
This text of 10 C.M.A. 71 (United States v. Reid) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Opinion of the Court
A special court-martial convicted the accused of three violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice and sentenced him to a bad-conduct discharge, partial forfeiture of pay and allowances, and confinement at hard labor for six months.
• Under the Table of Maximum Punishments the offenses carry a maximum punishment of a bad-conduct discharge, total forfeitures, and confinement at hard labor for fifteen months. However, a special court-martial cannot impose a sentence which exceeds a bad-conduct discharge, partial forfeitures, and confinement at hard labor for six months. Article 19 Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 819. No instructions on the limits of punishment were given to the court-martial. The board of review below determined that the omission constituted error. See United States v Turner, 9 USCMA 124, 25 CMR 386. But it concluded the accused was not prejudiced.
The board of review reasoned that the sentence actually imposed on the accused “took into consideration the accused’s class ‘Q’ allotment” and otherwise indicated the court-martial was “well aware” of its sentence limitations under the Uniform Code. From these circumstances the board of review concluded the court-martial used “maximum punishment criteria” which did not exceed that “authorized.” We agree with this conclusion and we, therefore, affirm the decision of the board of review.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 C.M.A. 71, 10 USCMA 71, 27 C.M.R. 145, 1958 CMA LEXIS 386, 1958 WL 3530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-reid-cma-1958.