United States v. Reid

205 F. App'x 175
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Reid. Read the opinion of the Court — 523 F.3d 310
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 13, 2006·No. 05-5206·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Davon Donnell Reid, pursuant to a written plea agreement, pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to distribute more than fifty grams of cocaine base and a quantity of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2000). Reid was sentenced to 168 months’ imprisonment. We affirm Reid’s sentence.

On appeal, Reid contends the district court erred by treating the guidelines as mandatory in violation of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). As Reid raises this issue for the first time on appeal, review is for plain error. See United States v. White, 405 F.3d 208, 215 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 668, 163 L.Ed.2d 539 (2005). To establish plain error, Reid must show that an error occurred, that the error was plain, and that the error affected his substantial rights. Id. Because the district court clearly indicated that it treated the guidelines as advisory and rendered its sentence in conformity with Booker, we conclude Reid has failed to establish that the court plainly erred.

Accordingly, we affirm Reid’s sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Reid, 205 F. App'x 175 (4th Cir. 2006).

205 F. App'x 175 (United States v. Reid) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)
United States v. Anthony Gerald White, Sr.
405 F.3d 208 (Fourth Circuit, 2005)
Millan-Torres v. United States
546 U.S. 1023 (Supreme Court, 2005)