United States v. Reid Bentley Barker
This text of 409 F.2d 846 (United States v. Reid Bentley Barker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
409 F.2d 846
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Reid Bentley BARKER, Appellant.
No. 13155.
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.
Argued May 5, 1969.
Decided May 13, 1969.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro; Edwin M. Stanley, Judge.
R. R. Ryder, Richmond, Va., for appellant.
William H. Murdock, U. S. Atty. (Richard M. Dailey, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., on brief), for appellee.
Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and SOBELOFF and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
We find no deficiency in the evidence to support the conviction and no illegality in the search of the automobile.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
409 F.2d 846, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-reid-bentley-barker-ca4-1969.