United States v. Reginald Victor Bias
This text of 2 F.3d 1158 (United States v. Reginald Victor Bias) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Reginald Victor BIAS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 90-50248.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 21, 1993.*
Decided Aug. 5, 1993.
Before: BROWNING, TANG, and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
Reginald Victor Bias appeals his conviction and sentence imposed following a bench trial for possession with intent to distribute and to manufacture phencyclidine in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841(a)(1).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Bias' counsel submitted a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review. Counsel also filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issue for review.
The motion of counsel to withdraw is GRANTED and the judgment is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 F.3d 1158, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 28252, 1993 WL 300611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-reginald-victor-bias-ca9-1993.