United States v. Reginald Falice

704 F. App'x 256
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 27, 2017
Docket17-6856
StatusUnpublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 704 F. App'x 256 (United States v. Reginald Falice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Reginald Falice, 704 F. App'x 256 (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

■ Reginald Felice appeals the district court’s text order denying his motion to dismiss his federal criminal conviction for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See United States v. Falice, No. 3:98-cr-00244-GCM-1 (W.D.N.C. June 20, 2017).

We deny Falice’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Falice v. United States
W.D. North Carolina, 2019

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
704 F. App'x 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-reginald-falice-ca4-2017.