United States v. Reginald Falice
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
■ Reginald Felice appeals the district court’s text order denying his motion to dismiss his federal criminal conviction for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See United States v. Falice, No. 3:98-cr-00244-GCM-1 (W.D.N.C. June 20, 2017).
We deny Falice’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
704 F. App'x 256 (United States v. Reginald Falice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.