United States v. Reginald Falice

704 F. App'x 256
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 27, 2017·No. 17-6856·Unpublished·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

■ Reginald Felice appeals the district court’s text order denying his motion to dismiss his federal criminal conviction for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See United States v. Falice, No. 3:98-cr-00244-GCM-1 (W.D.N.C. June 20, 2017).

We deny Falice’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Reginald Falice, 704 F. App'x 256 (4th Cir. 2017).

704 F. App'x 256 (United States v. Reginald Falice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Falice v. United States
W.D. North Carolina, 2019