United States v. Reginald Falice
This text of 704 F. App'x 256 (United States v. Reginald Falice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
■ Reginald Felice appeals the district court’s text order denying his motion to dismiss his federal criminal conviction for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See United States v. Falice, No. 3:98-cr-00244-GCM-1 (W.D.N.C. June 20, 2017).
We deny Falice’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
704 F. App'x 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-reginald-falice-ca4-2017.