United States v. Reginald Dewayne Hutcherson

219 F. App'x 903
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided March 6, 2007·No. 06-15887·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Joseph A. Ingram, appointed counsel for Reginald Dewayne Hutcherson in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hutcherson’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. We also construe Hutcherson’s response letter as a motion for appointment of new counsel and a motion for extension of time to file a response brief and DENY those motions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Reginald Dewayne Hutcherson, 219 F. App'x 903 (11th Cir. 2007).

219 F. App'x 903 (United States v. Reginald Dewayne Hutcherson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goff v. Commissioner of Social Security
253 F. App'x 918 (Eleventh Circuit, 2007)