United States v. Reggie Isaac

466 F.2d 502, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7423
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 25, 1972
Docket72-1563
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 466 F.2d 502 (United States v. Reggie Isaac) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Reggie Isaac, 466 F.2d 502, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7423 (5th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The appellant Isaac was found guilty by a jury of knowingly and intentionally distributing approximately 11.65 grams of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). He contends that the judgment of conviction should be reversed because he was entrapped by undercover agents and would not have sold or distributed the heroin except for such entrapment. We affirm.

The evidence with respect to the issue of entrapment was fully developed during the course of the trial and was submitted to the jury under proper instructions of the court. There was ample evidence to support the verdict and judgment of guilt. See Sorrells v. United States, 287 U.S. 435, 53 S.Ct. 210, 77 L.Ed. 413 (1932); United States v. Villafana, 455 F.2d 478 (5th Cir. 1972); United States v. Virciglio, 441 F.2d 1295 (5th Cir. 1971); Pierce v. United States, 414 F.2d 163 (5th Cir. 1969).

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Mahoney
355 F. Supp. 418 (E.D. Louisiana, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
466 F.2d 502, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-reggie-isaac-ca5-1972.