United States v. Regalado-Flores

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Regalado-Flores

185 F. App'x 397

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 21, 2006·No. 05-40198·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Javier Regalado-Flores appeals his sentence for illegal entry. He argues that the district court erred by ordering him to cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample as a condition of supervised release. This claim is not ripe for review on direct appeal. See United States v. Riascos-Cuenu, 428 F.3d 1100, 1101-02 (5th Cir. 2005) , petition for cert. filed (Jan. 9, 2006) (No. 05-8662). The claim is dismissed. See id. at 1102.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM: *

Javier Regalado-Flores appeals his sentence for illegal entry. He argues that the district court erred by ordering him to cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample as a condition of supervised release. This claim is not ripe for review on direct appeal. See United States v. Riascos-Cuenu, 428 F.3d 1100, 1101-02 (5th Cir. 2005) , petition for cert. filed (Jan. 9, 2006) (No. 05-8662). The claim is dismissed. See id. at 1102.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

United States v. Regalado-Flores, 185 F. App'x 397 (5th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

185 F. App'x 397 (United States v. Regalado-Flores) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related