United States v. Rega

Second Circuit

United States v. Rega

208 F. App'x 27

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided December 7, 2006·No. No. 05-2524-cr·Published

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Defendant-Appellant Douglas Rega (“Rega”) appeals, pro se, the orders of the district court (Koeltl, J.), issued on November 26, 2003, and August 9, 2004, denying Rega’s motion for a corrected or reduced sentence pursuant to former Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm for substantially the reasons given by the district court in its thoughtful orders. Its conclusions were well within the court’s ample discretion.

We have considered all of Rega’s arguments and find them to be without merit. The decision of the district court is therefore AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

Defendant-Appellant Douglas Rega (“Rega”) appeals, pro se, the orders of the district court (Koeltl, J.), issued on November 26, 2003, and August 9, 2004, denying Rega’s motion for a corrected or reduced sentence pursuant to former Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm for substantially the reasons given by the district court in its thoughtful orders. Its conclusions were well within the court’s ample discretion.

We have considered all of Rega’s arguments and find them to be without merit. The decision of the district court is therefore AFFIRMED.

United States v. Rega, 208 F. App'x 27 (2d Cir. 2006).

Pincite

208 F. App'x 27 (United States v. Rega) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.