United States v. Reese
This text of 539 F. App'x 752 (United States v. Reese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Reese admits he didn’t see the allegedly defective notice before trial, and doesn’t allege he would have accepted a plea agreement but for the erroneous sentencing information. He therefore hasn’t demonstrated that the alleged error “affected substantial rights.” United States v. Gonzalez-Aparicio, 663 F.3d 419, 428 (9th Cir.2011).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
539 F. App'x 752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-reese-ca9-2013.