United States v. Reese
76 M.J. 51, 2016 CAAF LEXIS 1046
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedDecember 22, 2016
DocketNo. 17-0028/CG
StatusPublished
This text of 76 M.J. 51 (United States v. Reese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Reese, 76 M.J. 51, 2016 CAAF LEXIS 1046 (Ark. 2016).
Opinion
CCA 1422. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issues:
I. WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED IN ALLOWING THE GOVERNMENT TO MAKE A MAJOR CHANGE TO A SPECIFICATION AFTER THE COMPLAINING WITNESS’S TESTIMONY DID NOT SUPPORT THE OFFENSE AS ORIGINALLY CHARGED.
II. WHETHER THE SPECIFICATION OF THE ADDITIONAL CHARGE FAILS TO STATE AN OFFENSE WHERE THE TERMINAL ELE[52]*52MENT FAILED TO ALLEGE WORDS OF CRIMINALITY AND WHERE THE ALLEGED CONDUCT FELL WITHIN A LISTED OFFENSE OF ARTICLE 134, UCMJ.
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
76 M.J. 51, 2016 CAAF LEXIS 1046, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-reese-armfor-2016.