United States v. Reed
This text of United States v. Reed (United States v. Reed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-20371
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TARLETHA DIANE REED Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas (H-96-CR-0229-3)
January 23, 1998
Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Reed challenges her sentence on the grounds that she was
entitled to discovery at sentencing and that the Mandatory Victim
Restitution Act is unconstitutional. Reed’s arguments are without
merit. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Reed, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-reed-ca5-1998.