United States v. Redmond

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Redmond. Read the opinion of the Court — 256 F. App'x 655
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 6, 2007·No. 05-10645·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 21, 2007 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-10645 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LESLIE REDMOND

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:03-CR-377-ALL

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Leslie Redmond has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Redmond has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Redmond’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. See United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006). Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Redmond’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 05-10645

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Redmond, (5th Cir. 2007).

United States v. Redmond (United States v. Redmond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Cantwell
470 F.3d 1087 (Fifth Circuit, 2006)
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)