United States v. Redding
This text of 504 F. App'x 219 (United States v. Redding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Erwin Bernard Redding appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence and his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Redding, No. 3:09-cr-00067-JPB-DJJ-1, 2012 WL 2370205 (N.D. W. Va. 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
504 F. App'x 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-redding-ca4-2013.