United States v. Reddick

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Reddick

686 F. App'x 833

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided April 28, 2017·No. No. 16-15330 Non-Argument Calendar·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

J. Wrix Mcllvaine, appointed counsel for Qaaid Reddick in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Reddick’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

J. Wrix Mcllvaine, appointed counsel for Qaaid Reddick in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Reddick’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Reddick, 686 F. App'x 833 (11th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

686 F. App'x 833 (United States v. Reddick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related