United States v. Redd
71 M.J. 304, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 483
This text of 71 M.J. 304 (United States v. Redd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Redd, 71 M.J. 304, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 483 (Ark. 2012).
Opinion
CCA 201000682. Review granted on the following issue:
WHETHER THE TWO ADULTERY SPECIFICATIONS FAIL TO STATE AN OFFENSE BECAUSE THEY NEITHER ALLEGE NOR NECESSARILY IMPLY THAT THE CONDUCT WAS PREJUDICIAL TO GOOD ORDER AND DISCIPLINE OR OF A NATURE TO BRING DISCREDIT UPON THE ARMED FORCES.
No briefs will be granted under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
71 M.J. 304, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-redd-armfor-2012.