United States v. Reaves

170 F. App'x 112
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedMarch 13, 2006
DocketNo. 05-13890; D.C. Docket No. 04-14033-CR-DLG
StatusPublished

This text of 170 F. App'x 112 (United States v. Reaves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Reaves, 170 F. App'x 112 (11th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Arthur L. Wallace, III, appointed appellate counsel for Darrell Lavern Reaves, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal because, in his opinion, there are no issues of arguable merit on which to base the appeal. Counsel’s motion is supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion [113]*113to withdraw is GRANTED, and Reaves’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 F. App'x 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-reaves-ca11-2006.