United States v. Real property at 5383 Stonehurst Dr., Martinez, CA

District Court, E.D. California·Decided January 9, 2020·No. 2:19-cv-00636·Unknown

Opinion

11 McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN 33 Assistant U.S. Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 44 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2700 55 Attorneys for the United States 66 77 1100

1111 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2:19-CV-00636-JAM-DB

1122 Plaintiff, UNITED STATES’ REQUEST TO 1133 v. EXTEND THE DEADLINE TO SUBMIT A JOINT STATUS REPORT 1144 REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5383 FROM JANUARY 9, 2020 TO MARCH STONEHURST DRIVE, MARTINEZ, 11, 2020 APN: 367-230-018-7, INCLUDING ALL THERETO, et al., 1177 Defendants. 1188 1199 The United States submits the following Request to Extend the Deadline to file a Joint Status 2200 Report from January 9, 2020 to March 11, 2020. 2211 Introduction 2222 On April 15, 2019, the United States filed a civil forfeiture complaint in rem against fourteen real 2233 properties (“In Rem Defendants”) connected to fraud and money laundering crimes in the Eastern 2244 District of California and other areas. All known potential claimants to the In Rem Defendants were 2255 served in a manner consistent with Dusenbery v. United States, 534 U.S. 161, 168 (2002) and the 2266 applicable statutory authority. Furthermore, public notice on the official internet government forfeiture 2277 site, www.forfeiture.gov, began on May 4, 2019, and ran for thirty consecutive days, as required by Rule 11 See ECF No. 4. A Declaration of Publication was filed on July 12, 2019, which set forth, among other 22 items, that publication on the government’s forfeiture website was complete on June 2, 2019. See Dkt. 33 40. 44 This case is related to four other cases filed in the Eastern District of California: two civil cases, 55 United States v. 725 Main Street, Martinez, California, et al., Case 2:19−CV−00247-JAM-DB and 66 United States v. Approximately $6,567,897.50 Seized From CTBC Bank, Account Number 3800191916, 77 et al., Case 2:19-cv-00485-JAM-DB; and two recently filed criminal cases, United States v. Ronald 88 Roach, et al., 2:19-cr-00182-JAM and United States v. Robert Karmann, 2:19-cr-00222-JAM. A notice 99 of related case was also filed this week in another criminal case involving the DC Solar fraud, United 1100 States v. Ryan Guidry, 2:20-cr-00003-KJM.1 1111 The United States has also lodged the complaint on the bankruptcy docket for DC Solar’s parent 1122 company, In re Double Jump Inc., Case 19-bk-50102, a bankruptcy case filed in Reno, Nevada after the 1133 United States executed federal search and seizure warrants at DC Solar’s business and other locations in 1144 California associated with the company and its founders. The United States and the Chapter 7 Trustees 1155 for the entities related to DC Solar and its principals have since entered a Coordination Agreement 1166 concerning the In Rem Defendants and other assets connected to DC Solar and its principals. An order 1177 approving the Coordination Agreement was entered in late November 2019, resulting in the dismissal of 1188 two In Rem Defendants from this case.2 See Dkt. 49, 51. 1199 Good Cause 2200 The United States has provided notice to all potential claimants pursuant to law. Specifically, 2211 the In Rem Defendants are collectively owned by Jeffrey and Paulette Carpoff personally and through 2222 several LLCs, Dora Dog Properties, LLC, Dog Blue Properties, LLC, 475 Channel Road, LLC, 2750 2233 Maxwell Way, LLC, Fou Dog, LLC, Antioch Mini Storage, LLC, and 4021 Pike Lane, LLC. The 2244 government served copies of the complaint documents on the above LLCs through their registered agent 2255

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Real property at 5383 Stonehurst Dr., Martinez, CA, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

United States v. Real property at 5383 Stonehurst Dr., Martinez, CA (United States v. Real property at 5383 Stonehurst Dr., Martinez, CA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dusenbery v. United States
534 U.S. 161 (Supreme Court, 2002)