United States v. Reado
This text of United States v. Reado (United States v. Reado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-30022 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ALFRED READO, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 95-CR-20036-10 - - - - - - - - - - October 2, 1996 Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Alfred Reado, Jr., seeks to appeal his conviction for
conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine base in
violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. He contends that the evidence was
insufficient to support his conviction. We have reviewed the
record and the briefs of the parties and hold that there was no
manifest miscarriage of justice. See United States v. Laury, 49
F.2d 145, 151 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 162 (1995).
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. - 2 -
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Reado, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-reado-ca5-1996.