United States v. Rayon-Gonzalez
Opinion
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Edgar Rayon-Gonzalez raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez, 711 F.3d 541, 562-63 & n.28 (5th Cir. 2013) (en banc), in which we held that the generic, contemporary definition of sexual abuse of a minor does not require the age of consent to be below 17 years old and does not include an age-differential requirement. He also raises an argument' that is foreclosed by United States v. Elizondo-Hernandez, 755 F.3d 779, 781-82 (5th Cir. 2014), which held that the Texas offense of indecency with a child by contact satisfied the generic definition of sexual abuse of a minor. Accordingly, the motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
668 F. App'x 95 (United States v. Rayon-Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.