United States v. Raymundo Martinez-Vitela

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Raymundo Martinez-Vitela

213 F.3d 1205, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 19465, 2000 WL 675129

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 25, 2000·No. 98-50440·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Good cause appearing in the supporting documents, the motion filed by the American Immigration Lawyers Association to *1206 recall the mandate is hereby GRANTED. The mandate is recalled.

The opinion tiled in this case on October 26, 1999, and appearing at 193 F.3d 1047 (9th Cir.1999) is hereby withdrawn.

This case is ordered resubmitted for decision without further argument or briefing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Good cause appearing in the supporting documents, the motion filed by the American Immigration Lawyers Association to *1206 recall the mandate is hereby GRANTED. The mandate is recalled.

The opinion tiled in this case on October 26, 1999, and appearing at 193 F.3d 1047 (9th Cir.1999) is hereby withdrawn.

This case is ordered resubmitted for decision without further argument or briefing.

United States v. Raymundo Martinez-Vitela, 213 F.3d 1205, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 19465, 2000 WL 675129 (9th Cir. 2000).

Pincite

213 F.3d 1205 (United States v. Raymundo Martinez-Vitela) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Carlos Castro-Cortez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Jose Luis Araujo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Francisco Mario Funes-Quevado, A.K.A. Francisco Mario Funes v. Janet Reno, Attorney General, Ramon Rueda v. Richard C. Smith, District Director and Janet Reno, Attorney General, Nestor Salinas-Sandoval v. Janet Reno, Attorney General, Richard Eugene Smith, and Immigration and Naturalization Service

239 F.3d 1037 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)

Castro-Cortez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

239 F.3d 1037 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)

Opinion

Related